Monday, April 15, 2019
Psychological Testing Essay Example for Free
psychological testifying EssayThis authorship is all about the uses and varieties of constitution and projective runnels. It aims to determine which tool is more reliable and valid to use in measuring and predicting the behavior of an individual. Furthermore, this paper discusses the uniformity of two different texts used containing the same stance that personality tests exceed the projective terms in terms of convenience to use, reliability, and validity. spirit and Projective Tests Introduction temperament and projective tests are mental tests used to notice and try the behavior of individuals in the school, community, and even workplace setting. The tests function to determine the end of personalities among different individuals (examinees) taking the same test. Upon taking the test, interpretation of examinees scores would depend on their respective test results. However, in this paper, researchers of different psychological tests suggest that personality tests a re more reliable and valid compared to projective tests.Personality and Projective Tests Albert Hood Richard Johnson (2008), a member of the American counsel Association, collaborated to come up with Assessment in Counseling (2008), a book which discusses the different types of personality and projective tests. In the text, samples of personality tests embroil the following the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory/MMPI2, Jacksons Personality Research Form (PRF), Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), California mental Inventory (CPI), and the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R).Further, CPI scale where 16 PF is adapted is recommended to be used for union and career counseling, job performance appraisals, and evaluation of management skills in the workplace. On the other hand, the different projective tests include the following the Rorschach Ink Blot Test, Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), House-Tree-Person (HTP), Roter Incomplete Sentences Blank, and Early Recolle ction. However, the Rorschach Inkblot Test was found to be the most commonly used projective technique to make inference of an individuals behavior.In addition, Anne Anastasi (Dept. of Psychology in Fodrham University) and Susana Urbina (Dept. of Psychology in University of Florida) (2002), in their book Psychological Testing, suggest that personality tests are far better(p) to use than projective tests since the latter is more complicated to execute and is more given to erroneous interpretation regardless of the examiners years of experience in handling the test. chain of mountains of the Literature Problem and Significance of the ProblemThe significance of the problem is to answer the question Which is a better tool to predict the behavior of an individual, is it the personality or the projective tests? Research problem(s) Explored in the Study The two articles reviewed focalization on the problem whether personality tests, observation, and inventories are more reliable, pred ictive tool in measuring the behavior of an individual rather than the projective tests. Hypothesis in the study Hypothesis of this study suggests that using personality inventories or psychological tests are better than using projective tests to assess a persons behavior.Research normal and Methodology Research design to be used is descriptive correlational. The approach or tool to be used is the Pearson (r) correlation to determine the relationship between the two variables. Conclusion Psychological tests are tools to measure and predict the behavior of an individual. Depending on its purpose, personality tests and projective tests aim to assess personalities in different settings such as school, workplace, and community.In school, the tests serve the college students need to be counseled for the career that suits their personality at work, the tests are used to evaluate which candidate is more fit for the job and in the community, the tests determine who are mentally healthy and who are not for providing welfare. References Anastasi, A. Urbina S. (2002). Psychological Testing. New Jersey Prentice-Hall, Inc. Hood, A. B. Johnson R. (2008). Assessment in Counseling A Guide to Psychological Assessment Procedures. Stevenson Avenue, Alexandria American Counseling Association.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.