Global Missions Paper Essay

In this essay I give analyzes Escobars thesis and compares and contrasts his theological soula with other theologians. I will discussion Escobars contextual approach as compared/contrasted in relation to one theological stalk with two other contemporary theologians. I will summarize how Escobars overall theological contribution either expands or challenges the theological perspectives of the two theologians chosen. Lastly, I will look at how these perspectives would influence my ministry if I were in a culturally diverse ministry setting.In 1970 there was a group of theologists who came unneurotic and absentminded to liberate themselves from a traditional fundamentalist view they formed The Latin American Theology partnership called The International Fellowship of Evangelical Students. There hope was to establish their own identity within the corporation because it was not tied to anything else. They received the chance to speak at a worldwide mixed cognomen office where th ey each deliberated spiritual matters that connected with the hardships of the Latin American people. In 1973 the Chicago Declaration was an labour to balance civic responsibility with Christian belief. Twenty years later as crisis arose it was re naked as a jaybirded. Samuel Escobar was a attracter who was among the first to know that a special methodology was necessary to get people to reverse together based on shared beliefs. His theology is structured by reevaluating biblical disclosures and relating them to both social and governmental realities as he aims his concentration on a theology of boot march. In his book The clean Global Mission I read about his lengthy thoughts on this matter.In there he is able to consider a new missionary drive and explores how he thinks evangelical mission work ought to be done. The Christian churchs mission on a more global apparent movement is to bring together believers from around the world. Escobar established a theology which starte d with the fraternity that merged social, church and state. Escobar mute that evolving cultures may notalways be in line with traditional Christian beliefs. Missionary work wishs to investigate each new situation for the best possible outcome of all involved. Escobar proposed a missionary work that assigns the bond faith with in its tasks. He hails the success of spiritual works as integral to a mission. The overall effort essential bring forth the involvement of each person who desires to share their faith socially. The projected outcome would be a church able to combine its mission objective with the desire to share its faith with others.Contextual theology disputes the differences of who and when theological literature was written. Theology besides argues the contextual change in the setting. As the need arises to interpret various new religious questions new theology is formulated. Evangelicals now try to plug into the theology to mission work in a modeling that recognize s cultural changes. Escobars theology is said to have incorporated both social science and Biblical revelation. He was an avid supporter for the Bible and started the basis for the theology of mission work. He believed that functional missionaries hightail it out the work as noted in evangelical revelations. The early theologian did not exertion to reach passages in the bible to the current events of the world. Escobar meet with both Pannenberg and Moltmann on this topic.Moltmann believed theology needed to relate to experiences in life. Pannenberg does not view this issue as relevant. He knew that the scriptures stated for followers to await a specific moment in time when the final truth, that which we cannot understand with limited knowledge would be revealed to us. Moltmanns theology is landed estateed in biblical descriptions to him the scriptures are more than mere tales, they are real historical events and should be clarified as such. Pannenbergs view on Biblical history is very much the same. Grenz when asked summarized Pannenbergs theology as a notion of faith which is not a way of knowing in addition to reason but it is grounded in public historical knowledge. Both theologians offer their interpretations of the Bible not by considering it a legend but by claiming its historicity and its accurateness.The role of the gospel is also stressed by Escobar just like the other two theologians he approaches the issues by considering the countersigns first, the world and how the Scriptures apply to the issue. Theology capacity not necessarily be dependent on the Bible but it tries to imply a need forknowledge and understanding of deity. Evangelicals and missionaries would be inconceivable without the Bible. Escobar argues that evangelicals must first acknowledge that they themselves have a yen way to go in terms of deepening their understanding of biblical based mission work. In order to establish this as valid they must base it on sound biblical teachi ngs.Escobar goes on to further state that theology history and the social science are useful as tools utilise for better understanding of Gods word and for contemporary mission work but but Gods Word that is inspired and always able to renew the mission. Escobar relates theology to history as he correlates these to sciences which are substantially valid for providing rational arguments in regards to the existence or the non existence of God. many a(prenominal) scientists disregard the Biblical truth as actual fact and indeed are moreinclined to read the Scripture as fantasy instead of historical true events. Evangelicals who are without adequate historical awareness or biblical training are subjected to making mistakes. He goes on to further emphasize that criticism must stand as the instrument of correction. The most basic convictions must remain a solid ground for evangelists and they must learn to embrace and sustain what is critical nature.When confronted with a setting that encompasses different cultures and we need to relate the Biblical truth in a way that is comprehensible and accurate for everyone we need to draw a line between what we think is valid and what individuals who are part of different cultures regard as such. We may stand solid for a certain group of individuals but it may not be relevant to a different group of people. It is with in this understanding that contextual theology is able to relate and the situation relates to the Bible being multi-cultural for all people. The Bible was written above culture and stands for everyone. In this sense working within a multi cultureal environment requires one to gain thourough knowledge of specific cultures while being feed to sugesstions and having the ability to realate those ideas to traditional Biblical truths.ReferenceEscobar, S. (2002). Changing Tides Latin America and World Mission Today,Orbis Books Escobar, S. (2011). A Time for Mission The Challengefor Global Christianity, InterVarsity PressFord, David F., ed. (1997). The Modern Theologians An Introduction to Christian theology in the twentieth century (2nd ed.). Malden, MAGrenz, S.J. (1988). Wolfhart Pannenbergs quest for untimate truth Religion online. Retrieved August 20, 2014Grenz, S. J., & Olson, R. E. (1992). 20th-century theology God and the world in a transitional age. Downers Grove, IL InterVarsity Press.